UA-184069179-1 123: Lenacapavir for HIV Prevention - Febrile

Episode 123

123: Lenacapavir for HIV Prevention

Drs. Anshel Kenkare and Mike Reid share a conversation about the incredible science and current context of lenacapavir for HIV prevention, which was recently approved by the FDA.

Episodes | Consult Notes | Subscribe | Twitter | Merch | febrilepodcast@gmail.com


Febrile is produced with support from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)

Transcript
Speaker:

Hi everyone.

Speaker:

Welcome to Febrile, a cultured podcast about all things infectious disease.

Speaker:

We use consult questions to dive into ID clinical reasoning, diagnostics

Speaker:

and antimicrobial management.

Speaker:

I'm Sara Dong, your host and a Med Peds ID doc.

Speaker:

I'll

Speaker:

first introduce Dr. Anshel Kenkare.

Speaker:

Anshel is a second year

Speaker:

internal medicine resident at the Montefiore Primary Care and

Speaker:

Social Internal Medicine Program.

Speaker:

He's interested in a career in ID focused on public health

Speaker:

and environmental stewardship.

Speaker:

Also, joining us today

Speaker:

is Dr. Mike Reid.

Speaker:

Mike is an Associate

Speaker:

Professor at University of California, San Francisco.

Speaker:

He currently serves as the Chief Science Officer for PEPFAR in the

Speaker:

Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy in the US State Department.

Speaker:

He also serves as Associate Director of the Center for Global Health Diplomacy,

Speaker:

Delivery, and Economics at UCSF.

Speaker:

All right.

Speaker:

So as everyone's favorite cultured podcast, we ask our guests to

Speaker:

share a little piece of culture.

Speaker:

So it's really just something non-medical that makes you happy.

Speaker:

Um, so what are you guys bringing today??

Speaker:

Oh, I can start.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

A long time listener, first time caller.

Speaker:

So excited.

Speaker:

Um, I think for me, I did a tour of the Southwest National Parks recently.

Speaker:

Ooh.

Speaker:

and I had a lot of hype around Zion and the Grand Canyon, which were incredible.

Speaker:

But I loved Arches the National Park, uh, and I just found it so

Speaker:

peaceful and beautiful that I will highly recommend it to everybody.

Speaker:

Very cool.

Speaker:

That's awesome.

Speaker:

So, um, on an outdoors theme, I recently walked the Camino

Speaker:

de Santiago in northern Spain.

Speaker:

So two weeks ago I was in Northern Spain walking the, the pilgrimage to Santiago.

Speaker:

Long days of walking, conversations with strangers from all over the world.

Speaker:

It was really restorative.

Speaker:

Also a humbling, um, realization of how, uh, how at least I

Speaker:

need to feel grounded, um,

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

could choose a quiet path.

Speaker:

And, um, Spanish tapas, uh, were, were, were very restorative.

Speaker:

Um, you can't pour from an empty cup rate, and this was a

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

my cup refilled.

Speaker:

It was great.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Oh, that's lovely.

Speaker:

Now I wanna go take a walk outside.

Speaker:

Um, so, Anshel had reached out with this great idea to have an episode

Speaker:

and luckily we had some awesome timing because hot off the press, we

Speaker:

have heard about the FDA approval of HIV prevention option lenacapavir.

Speaker:

And so we're gonna talk about that today, but I will go ahead and hand

Speaker:

it off to Anshel to take us forward.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Thank you so much.

Speaker:

I, I really just wanted to talk to Dr. Reid today a little bit about lenacapavir.

Speaker:

So just to start, what is lenacapavir and how well does it work?

Speaker:

Yeah, so lenacapavir, um, is a first in class HIV capsid inhibitor.

Speaker:

It's a, a novel antiretroviral that targets multiple stages in

Speaker:

the HIV lifecycle, including capsid assembly, disassembly, viral release.

Speaker:

Um, and for the context of this podcast, it's actually marketed

Speaker:

as two different products.

Speaker:

There's lenacapavir for treatment, which I think is called Sunlenca in the US.

Speaker:

And then, as you alluded to hot off the press, the, the formulation

Speaker:

for prevention, which is called Yeztugo, is now available.

Speaker:

Um, it's available as an oral tablet.

Speaker:

More importantly, as a twice yearly subcutaneous injection.

Speaker:

Um, I don't think I'll speak too much about treatment with you today,

Speaker:

Anshel, but, um, I'm happy to share more details about the science

Speaker:

that has recently emerged around prevention and the use of LEN.

Speaker:

Yeah, I think that would be great.

Speaker:

Just thinking about how this would potentially apply to a patient.

Speaker:

Let's say we have a patient here I'm practicing in the Bronx, uh,

Speaker:

who is interested in transitioning from an oral PrEP regimen to

Speaker:

lenacapavir after seeing the news.

Speaker:

How easily can we switch her?

Speaker:

What's, what's the general availability of lenacapavir currently?.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Maybe I can start by just reviewing the clinical research that has been published

Speaker:

that sort of supports its use and then I can answer your questions around its

Speaker:

clinical role in a place like the Bronx.

Speaker:

Um, so.

Speaker:

Uh, late last year, at the end of 2024, the scientists who were

Speaker:

working on LEN published two papers: PURPOSE 1 and PURPOSE 2, both

Speaker:

published in New England Journal.

Speaker:

PURPOSE 1 looked at the role of LEN as a prevention tool for cisgender

Speaker:

women in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Speaker:

They, they evaluated LEN in a setting of very high HIV incidence

Speaker:

in, uh, Uganda and South Africa.

Speaker:

And they basically randomized participants to either getting injectable LEN

Speaker:

every six months or oral Truvada (emtricitabine-tenofovir disoproxil

Speaker:

fumarate), which as you know, is the gold standard for biomedical prevention.

Speaker:

Um, and they looked at, uh, outcomes over a 12 month period.

Speaker:

And in that study, and this is one, one of the most groundbreaking pieces of science,

Speaker:

I think, published in many, many years.

Speaker:

They found zero HIV infections in the LEN arm.

Speaker:

So an HIV incidence that was statistically indistinguishable from

Speaker:

zero, which has never been found before in a, in a prevention trial.

Speaker:

For, for the purposes of of your question, I think it's worth just

Speaker:

highlighting PURPOSE 2 though.

Speaker:

So PURPOSE 2, very similar study design, but this was in men and gender diverse

Speaker:

people, mostly in the US I think 60 research sites in the US and then

Speaker:

about 30 research sites across Brazil, Thailand, South Africa, Peru, Argentina.

Speaker:

Uh, I think there may have been one other country.

Speaker:

And again, they randomized individuals in that trial to LEN

Speaker:

every 6 months or, oral Truvada.

Speaker:

And what they found there, again, was incredibly impressive results.

Speaker:

Essentially two infections in the LEN group, um, among 2100 participants.

Speaker:

And, and that represented a 96% reduction in HIV risk compared

Speaker:

to background incidence.

Speaker:

So much higher superiority, uh, as compared to the oral option, uh, Truvada.

Speaker:

I think key takeaways, which again, relevant to your patient in the Bronx.

Speaker:

Near perfect prevention in in PURPOSE 1, um, a hundred percent efficacy and

Speaker:

96% efficacy and statistical superiority in PURPOSE 2 over daily oral PrEP.

Speaker:

Um, this is unheard of in, in HIV research.

Speaker:

I think the other thing to, to highlight that is, again, relevant to your

Speaker:

patient, um, and, and also validated by a fair amount of other research though,

Speaker:

is that Truvada, whilst an effective agent is only as good as it is when

Speaker:

people take it, um, and in PURPOSE 1, um, many people just didn't take it

Speaker:

or they didn't take it continuously during the, the research period.

Speaker:

And I think that speaks to the potential value of LEN as something

Speaker:

where adherence really isn't the same challenge because you're just getting

Speaker:

an injection every six months, and that injection offers sustained protection.

Speaker:

I think the other insight that, again, is relevant is just that

Speaker:

this is very well tolerated.

Speaker:

There were mild injection site reactions, some inflammation, a little bit of pain.

Speaker:

But overall almost everybody continued the LEN throughout the research period.

Speaker:

So for your patient, in the Bronx, and I will say I was a resident in the Bronx.

Speaker:

I totally appreciate that, that that client context.

Speaker:

Um, yeah, I think the potential to use this drug is very high.

Speaker:

I think this could have a, a really transformative impact for, for folks who

Speaker:

are at greatest risk of HIV acquisition.

Speaker:

And, and not only those that have a harder time taking pills, everybody,

Speaker:

the research shows everybody benefited.

Speaker:

Two, two things I'll say.

Speaker:

And then I'll let you ask your next question Anshel, um.

Speaker:

PURPOSE 1 and PURPOSE 2 are just two trials in a family of trials that

Speaker:

the drug company have sponsored.

Speaker:

Um, three, four, and five.

Speaker:

PURPOSE 3, 4, and 5 will explore the role of LEN in cisgendered people in the US.

Speaker:

I think that's three.

Speaker:

Um, PURPOSE 4 is looking at LEN in people who inject injection drugs And PURPOSE 5

Speaker:

is looking at LEN in Europe and the UK.

Speaker:

So there are still some important unknowns about its potential

Speaker:

impact in those populations.

Speaker:

Look, I would imagine that it will be very efficacious in those contexts too.

Speaker:

But, but we will wait on those data that some of which will be

Speaker:

published pretty soon to confirm that.

Speaker:

The other answer to your question though, about is it a good option for somebody

Speaker:

in the Bronx, is, um, is it available?

Speaker:

Right?

Speaker:

And, and I think this is the really exciting thing.

Speaker:

So on June 18th, the FDA approved LEN for, for prevention, um,

Speaker:

under the brand name, Yeztugo.

Speaker:

Um, I dunno how they come up with these names for new drugs, but it is what it is.

Speaker:

And I think people have started to prescribe, I think the first drug

Speaker:

prescription was soon thereafter.

Speaker:

Nonetheless, I think a major challenge is, is ensuring that insurance

Speaker:

companies and, and patient assistance programs make the drug available.

Speaker:

I understand that Gilead have, have committed to broad access.

Speaker:

They have like an advance access program to reduce costs for, for clients.

Speaker:

Um, but I imagine that it'll be a few months before it's actually available

Speaker:

and on insurance schemes, et cetera.

Speaker:

The last thing I'll say, and I'm I'm not an expert on, on drug pricing

Speaker:

in the US, but think it will be quite expensive to begin with.

Speaker:

The reports I've read are that in the US, Yeztugo will, will be priced

Speaker:

annually at between $28,000 and $42,000.

Speaker:

And so that may be prohibitive for, for some, although I understand that they,

Speaker:

they priced it at that, um, level with the expectation that insurance companies will

Speaker:

be able to, to cover that for many people.

Speaker:

So there's a long answer to your short question.

Speaker:

Happy to revisit any of the pieces that weren't clear.

Speaker:

No, I think that was extremely clear.

Speaker:

I think, it really is amazing, uh, that we have this FDA approval now, and I, I

Speaker:

think the cost overall is something that everybody seems to be questioning, but

Speaker:

as people start to prescribe, I think we're gonna see, see where it lands

Speaker:

and, and kind of advocate from there.

Speaker:

I think a similar question, just because you referenced the PURPOSE 1 trial

Speaker:

was conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Speaker:

If we were in a clinic in rural Uganda, what kind of access to

Speaker:

lenacapavir would potentially be seen?

Speaker:

And then on top of that, uh, can be a little bit contentious, but how

Speaker:

has the PEPFAR freeze and subsequent defunding affected the ability to roll

Speaker:

out a drug like lenacapavir, which has been so incredibly effective?

Speaker:

Yeah, it's, it's a great question.

Speaker:

Well, both, both of those are great questions.

Speaker:

I think, um, up until recently there was, there was great optimism that

Speaker:

LEN would be widely available in Sub-Saharan Africa, in, in the imminent

Speaker:

future, contingent on FDA approval.

Speaker:

I think there is still optimism that lenacapavir will be available in

Speaker:

Sub-Saharan Africa in the imminent future.

Speaker:

But I, I think it's fair to say that the incoming administration have

Speaker:

taken a different approach to global health than past administrations,

Speaker:

Democratic and Republican.

Speaker:

Um, and as you alluded to Anshel, they instituted a, a pause on foreign

Speaker:

assistance early in January after President Trump, uh, returned to power.

Speaker:

And that pause on foreign assistance has had quite substantial impacts on

Speaker:

the program that I'm involved with, PEPFAR, the, the President's Emergency

Speaker:

Plan for AIDS relief and specifically, um, we initially saw a pause of all

Speaker:

programming, and then quickly thereafter a resumption of life sustaining activities.

Speaker:

So, within a few days of that initial pause after January 21st, we were able

Speaker:

to resume much of the activity that had been undertaken before that, as long

Speaker:

as it was related to care and treatment and other life sustaining activities.

Speaker:

However, there was a pause on all prevention activities that were sustained.

Speaker:

And that has had an impact on our capacity to support biomedical prevention

Speaker:

programming in high burden countries that PEPFAR had previously supported.

Speaker:

I'll also say that to execute the programs that we fund has been concomitantly

Speaker:

challenged by the dissolution of US AID as one of our implementing agencies.

Speaker:

And so whilst some of our programming that has been funded through other US

Speaker:

agencies like the CDC has resumed, some of the programmatic activities undertaken

Speaker:

by USAID, particularly related to prevention have, have not been resumed.

Speaker:

So all of those things have had a big impact.

Speaker:

Perhaps we can include in the links to this podcast, some of

Speaker:

the great science that has been done to try and evaluate that.

Speaker:

Um, there have been 10 or 20, maybe 30 really great modeling papers that have

Speaker:

been produced that have tried to assess the impact on the pause in foreign

Speaker:

assistance on HIV outcomes, mortality, incidence, as well as on other diseases

Speaker:

including tuberculosis, malaria.

Speaker:

Um, I just draw your attention to one.

Speaker:

There's a great paper that's published in Lancet HIV by Debra ten Brink, at al

Speaker:

about three months ago that estimated if that pause was continued after January

Speaker:

in perpetuity, then there would be 3 million additional deaths by 2026, um,

Speaker:

from HIV, but there are a number of other papers out there that have similarly

Speaker:

kind of evaluated either a country level or across Sub-Saharan Africa, the

Speaker:

impact of the pause on, on programs.

Speaker:

There's even a website you can go to.

Speaker:

There's the PEPFAR Impact Counter website, which is produced by colleagues

Speaker:

at Boston University that tries to track in real time the, the impact of

Speaker:

these pauses on, on clinical programs.

Speaker:

And I, again, I think we might be able to share the link to

Speaker:

that in the notes to the podcast.

Speaker:

Um, so that all brings me back to, to your question around the, the person in Uganda,

Speaker:

um, who, who would be interested in LEN.

Speaker:

And I think the question is no, right now, there is no ability to make LEN available.

Speaker:

Um, uh, for a couple of reasons.

Speaker:

One is that we're still in this place where the current administration haven't

Speaker:

determined what their policy is vis-a-vis, um, supporting prevention programming.

Speaker:

And two, because the drug is not yet available in Sub-Saharan Africa

Speaker:

and, and at a point where it is, the question remains as to whether it'll be

Speaker:

affordable for, for ministries of health to procure with their own resources.

Speaker:

Maybe I'll just reflect on, on, on some other data that has been published

Speaker:

that speaks to the excitement and I think, desire of, of, of recipients

Speaker:

of care in Sub-Saharan Africa to, to access long-acting agents.

Speaker:

So there's a, a research group, um, actually from the University

Speaker:

of California, San Francisco, the SEARCH (Sustainable East Africa

Speaker:

Research in Community Health) group that work in Kenya and Uganda.

Speaker:

And they have looked at willingness of individuals to switch from Truvada

Speaker:

to Cabotegravir, which is another long-acting agent, and, and found that

Speaker:

in that setting almost everybody, the vast majority of people when given the

Speaker:

choice moved from oral to injectable.

Speaker:

And one would anticipate that the same is true for LEN.

Speaker:

That if available it will be willingly and excitedly pursued by

Speaker:

individuals who would benefit from it.

Speaker:

And we can spend a little bit of time, uh, dwelling on this

Speaker:

next reflection if it's useful.

Speaker:

But I think one of the key issues for Sub-Saharan Africa is, is not

Speaker:

so much related to the efficacy.

Speaker:

We know based off of PURPOSE 1, that this is incredibly efficacious drug

Speaker:

for prevention, but really the cost effectiveness and the cost effectiveness

Speaker:

will be determined by what price LEN is available at and, and the

Speaker:

volumes that are, are procured to ensure that that price is affordable.

Speaker:

And then also the incidence.

Speaker:

So there is a fair amount of modeling that's also been done to try and

Speaker:

anticipate where LEN will have the greatest impact in high burden settings.

Speaker:

I think initial rollout modeling suggests that if we were able to roll out between

Speaker:

one and 6 million person years of LEN over a three year period, then that

Speaker:

could avert up to a hundred thousand infections in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Speaker:

That's actually a, a relatively small fraction of the global

Speaker:

incidence, but it's a vital step towards sort of a broader adoption.

Speaker:

The places where LEN will be most cost effective are the

Speaker:

places of highest incidence.

Speaker:

So in Sub-Saharan Africa, that really will mean um, South

Speaker:

Africa, which has the highest HIV incidence in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Speaker:

And there, there are a number of districts with very high incidence where we, you

Speaker:

know, ideally LEN would be targeted.

Speaker:

And then there are other smaller pockets in many other countries in

Speaker:

Sub-Saharan Africa where if targeted to the right priority populations,

Speaker:

it would again be, be cost effective.

Speaker:

Um.

Speaker:

then similarly in the Philippines, you may know that there's a sort of

Speaker:

a, a really rapidly unfolding HIV epidemic in the Philippines right now.

Speaker:

And that would be a place where there would be a likelihood of

Speaker:

high impact in the near term.

Speaker:

The other thing to say is that, that impact will, will, right,

Speaker:

will diminish over time, right?

Speaker:

So that as incidence goes down, the cost will go up.

Speaker:

That is a sort of a paradox that we would have to deal with.

Speaker:

But nonetheless, the key message is that, yes, effective.

Speaker:

Yes, cost effective in the right, right settings, and it all

Speaker:

comes down to what the price is.

Speaker:

And I haven't spoken to the price.

Speaker:

I'm happy to.

Speaker:

Um, the cost savings potentials exist when the price for LEN

Speaker:

is around 40 to $60 per year.

Speaker:

LEN would be cost saving in those highest burden settings.

Speaker:

Um, and that's compared to, so when they do these assessments of

Speaker:

cost effectiveness, they compare it to the, the lifetime cost of

Speaker:

antiretroviral therapy, right?

Speaker:

So.

Speaker:

Because of the amazing work of PEPFAR over the last 20 years, antiretroviral

Speaker:

therapy, um, in high burden, low income settings is really cheap.

Speaker:

A year's supply of TLD, um, which is tenofovir, lamivudine,

Speaker:

dolutegravir costs $40 a year.

Speaker:

So it's actually not that expensive an intervention.

Speaker:

So if you want a prevention intervention that is more cost effective than

Speaker:

ART, then it has to be cheaper than the, you know, 20 years of TLD.

Speaker:

And so what that means is cost of, of closer to, to 40 to $60 per year.

Speaker:

I have two more reflections and then I'll answer your next

Speaker:

question if there is one, Anshel.

Speaker:

But, there is some really exciting data that has been shared but not peer

Speaker:

reviewed, including a paper that is currently under review with Lancet

Speaker:

HIV suggesting that generic drug companies could develop lenacapavir

Speaker:

at a cost of less than $25 per person per year, um, in the near future.

Speaker:

So what that means is that the cost of the goods, the cost of manufacturing could

Speaker:

be reduced substantially from the cost that the originator Gilead are making

Speaker:

it at to a really affordable price.

Speaker:

$25 a year and $25 a year would be very affordable in many high burden countries.

Speaker:

The caveat there is that for the generic drug companies to make it

Speaker:

available at that affordable price, they have to be sufficient volumes.

Speaker:

Um, they're not gonna make it at $25 per prevention year if only a hundred thousand

Speaker:

people in Sub-Saharan Africa are on it.

Speaker:

They'll, they'll be able to make it at those cost effective prices when

Speaker:

the volumes are really, really high.

Speaker:

So when there are more than 10 million people on prevention per year.

Speaker:

And so they, we end up in a kind of a chicken egg you know, conundrum where

Speaker:

you, you need that early adoption of LEN, probably from procurement of the

Speaker:

Gilead formulation, the originator formulation, to start to drive the

Speaker:

market so that generics know that there is an appetite for this drug.

Speaker:

So they then go out and develop more and do so at a price that is, is affordable.

Speaker:

To their credit, Gilead have said we want this drug to be widely available

Speaker:

Sub-Saharan Africa, and we are gonna make the, the license available to several

Speaker:

different generic drug manufacturers.

Speaker:

So I think they've made their license available to six generic drug

Speaker:

companies right now who in theory, are gonna be able to run with it,

Speaker:

figure out how to make it as, as effectively and cheaply as possible.

Speaker:

But those generic companies need a market, right?

Speaker:

And they're not gonna jump in unless they know that there is a

Speaker:

market for this drug, which brings us back to this challenge that.

Speaker:

Who's gonna pay for LEN in the first place.

Speaker:

And historically, that has been the US government through PEPFAR,

Speaker:

um, as well as the Global Fund, which is a, a multilateral donor

Speaker:

initiative that includes funding from the US government, also from

Speaker:

many other high income countries.

Speaker:

Global Fund have said yes, we are very interested in investing

Speaker:

in LEN and they are going to procure it and make it available.

Speaker:

Um.

Speaker:

I am very hopeful that this US administration sees the value

Speaker:

of LEN as a prevention tool that that, um, will help us control the

Speaker:

epidemic in Sub-Saharan Africa and is worth investing in, but that,

Speaker:

that remains to be seen at this time.

Speaker:

If they do, I think, um, the investments from the US Government and Global

Speaker:

Fund could be really catalytic in driving down the prices to a point

Speaker:

at which they become more affordable.

Speaker:

But ultimately, and this is my last reflection, we, we are moving into a

Speaker:

different time in global health, where the role of donors like the US government,

Speaker:

like Global Fund is, is, is evolving.

Speaker:

And there is increasing consensus that many countries, particularly

Speaker:

middle income countries, should be funding their own HIV response.

Speaker:

Um, and in that context, um, there are, there are many countries in Sub-Saharan

Speaker:

Africa with a high HIV burden that that will and should invest more in the,

Speaker:

the, the prevention programming that is ongoing in their countries rather than

Speaker:

relying on, on donors to support that.

Speaker:

And for those countries, I think there is a real challenge here in, in, in terms

Speaker:

of persuading them that LEN makes sense, particularly when you are comparing

Speaker:

LEN to Truvada, which is less than $40 a year, or to condoms which are very

Speaker:

effective and even more affordable, right.

Speaker:

Um, and so this is the calculus that ministers of health and ministers of

Speaker:

finance have to have to deal with.

Speaker:

I'll just say one last thing.

Speaker:

Even for those politicians though, the dividend of LEN in, in

Speaker:

particular high incidence priority populations is, is very compelling.

Speaker:

So if you can target LEN to those pockets of highest incidence, whether

Speaker:

those are people who inject drugs, men who have sex with men, professional

Speaker:

sex workers, um, and then some, some communities of adolescent girls and

Speaker:

young women with high HIV incidence, then you could still have a very impactful

Speaker:

and cost effective intervention.

Speaker:

The challenge there is to sort of identify those pockets and then with

Speaker:

precision, allocate the LEN in, in ways that ensure that you are getting not

Speaker:

only clinical bang for your buck, but also, financial bang for your buck.

Speaker:

And I, I think there's some really interesting science that we need to, to do

Speaker:

there around predictive tools, maybe the role of AI, um, et cetera, in determining

Speaker:

how we allocate a drug like LEN.

Speaker:

Um.

Speaker:

Finally, finally, um, in Sub-Saharan Africa, we have a

Speaker:

generalized epidemic, right?

Speaker:

It's quite different from the US where we have a, a, an epidemic that is

Speaker:

really concentrated in small pockets and in that generalized epidemic in,

Speaker:

in Sub-Saharan Africa, the, the risk of HIV acquisition is fairly heterogeneous.

Speaker:

Um, and so that makes it harder to determine who, who

Speaker:

is gonna benefit most from it.

Speaker:

Certainly in priority populations, we know that LEN will have value, but in

Speaker:

that, in that heterogeneous context, it's more like finding a needle in a haystack.

Speaker:

You do have to scale interventions large to see that benefit when

Speaker:

that risk is so heterogeneous.

Speaker:

So, which, which again adds to this paradox of where LEN

Speaker:

will have the greatest value.

Speaker:

That was a really long-winded way of answering your short question,

Speaker:

so I hope that got some of the answer that you were after.

Speaker:

No, not at all.

Speaker:

I, I think that was truly fantastic and I appreciate a lot

Speaker:

of the insights you provided.

Speaker:

I, I did wanna also highlight specifically, the removal of a hundred

Speaker:

thousand people from the pipeline of screening, diagnosis and treatment.

Speaker:

So really like taking them entirely out of that pipeline, even though

Speaker:

it may seem like a smaller number of people, it goes a long way at

Speaker:

curtailing the overall epidemic.

Speaker:

I also wanted to highlight some international advocacy organizations

Speaker:

that, that really helped push for the generic manufacturing of lenacapavir.

Speaker:

Uh, I put a link to the People's Medicine Alliance, uh, and I think that, uh, a

Speaker:

lot of countries in Sub-Saharan Africa where this drug was tested, um, had

Speaker:

community-based organizations come together and advocate for themselves

Speaker:

and, and, and really strongly push for this, as you said, lifesaving drug.

Speaker:

And, and we, we talk about it being lifesaving.

Speaker:

I do wanna ask if you have any concerns about the use of lenacapavir?

Speaker:

We've really highlighted the pros, uh, and, and I think for very good reason.

Speaker:

Uh, but anything in the implementation that we need to be conscious of,

Speaker:

aside from the cost effectiveness?

Speaker:

Yeah, that's a great question.

Speaker:

There are a couple of things that are worth highlighting.

Speaker:

From a biomedical point of view, I think a potential concern

Speaker:

relates to resistance, right?

Speaker:

Um, so as a first in class capsid inhibitor, LEN represents a novel

Speaker:

mechanism, which also means that, uh, we have limited real world

Speaker:

data on resistance patterns, and particularly in settings of imperfect

Speaker:

adherence or delayed HIV diagnosis.

Speaker:

It remains to be seen, um, whether we need to be concerned about

Speaker:

the potential of LEN resistance.

Speaker:

I will just add to that a caveat that in Sub-Saharan Africa LEN's

Speaker:

not available for treatment.

Speaker:

In the near term, if it's available, it will only be

Speaker:

available for, for prevention.

Speaker:

So, so the.

Speaker:

The issue of resistance may not be such a big issue in those settings,

Speaker:

but I can imagine that in a place like the US where LEN is going to be used

Speaker:

as part of treatment and prevention, then be important to consider, um, the

Speaker:

potential development of resistance.

Speaker:

And you can mitigate that challenge by ensuring that as it's scaled,

Speaker:

it's scaled with safeguards, right?

Speaker:

So that that means reliable HIV testing before initiation and then monitoring on,

Speaker:

on LEN, um, and, as with anybody's who's on oral Truvada or, or Cabotegravir, they,

Speaker:

they need to continue to get tested whilst taking that prevention modality to ensure

Speaker:

they haven't developed HIV whilst on the drug and therefore at risk for resistance.

Speaker:

I am not so worried about resistance in Sub-Saharan Africa, though.

Speaker:

I think that the, the biggest concern for me is really about how do we,

Speaker:

how do we get to scale and do so affordably, affordably so that ministries

Speaker:

of health are able to procure it.

Speaker:

That's the biggest challenge that we probably face in the near

Speaker:

term for places where I work.

Speaker:

Thank you so much Dr. Reid.

Speaker:

I, I just wanted to ask for people who are listening, how did you get into

Speaker:

this role and can you describe a little bit more about PEPFAR in general?

Speaker:

Sure.

Speaker:

I finished residency at arguably the best residency program in the

Speaker:

country at, uh, Montefiore Primary Care Social Medicine Program.

Speaker:

I'll just throw that out there.

Speaker:

Um, and actually knew then that I wanted to do global health.

Speaker:

I, I was really interested in issues of justice and equity, um, preferential

Speaker:

care for the poor and underserved and, and immediately after residency

Speaker:

worked in a PEPFAR program, um,

Speaker:

Oh, cool.

Speaker:

Africa, first, first living in New York then, moving to

Speaker:

and living in, in Botswana.

Speaker:

Uh, I'll just mention what PEPFAR is and I'll come back to it again.

Speaker:

So, PEPFAR is the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.

Speaker:

It's the US Government's flagship program for assistance for HIV established

Speaker:

in 2003 by G.W. Bush and has had an unprecedented impact on the HIV epidemic.

Speaker:

More than 25 million people's lives have been saved.

Speaker:

More than 20 million people are on treatment right now through PEPFAR and

Speaker:

over $110 billion of of aid has gone to partner countries during that period.

Speaker:

And.

Speaker:

At the time that I did residency, PEPFAR was a very morally compelling

Speaker:

program that I wanted to be all in on.

Speaker:

And so out of residency, I, I worked in a, a funded program in Manhattan

Speaker:

at Columbia University, and then moved to Botswana and, and lived there for,

Speaker:

for four years where I worked as a an HIV physician and you know, it was

Speaker:

great, like on the one hand, I was able to, to see how care was delivered.

Speaker:

I was providing HIV care in rural Botswana, but on the other hand, it

Speaker:

was fairly jarring to be in a setting where, um, me as a UK trained, American

Speaker:

paid physician was delivering care, while I was surrounded by people

Speaker:

who were far better clinicians than me, but didn't have the resources.

Speaker:

Um, and it really got me thinking about how do we improve the health

Speaker:

systems in these countries so that they're able to respond to HIV.

Speaker:

Um, so I did that for five years and, and realized actually I wanted to do more

Speaker:

training and I was very interested in how do you optimize health systems in high

Speaker:

HIV burden settings and then ended up doing fellowship after five years away.

Speaker:

Um, did ID fellowship.

Speaker:

By the time I'd finished ID fellowship, I was deep in the weeds on how

Speaker:

do you optimize health systems?

Speaker:

And, and that led to my subsequent career doing health policy

Speaker:

research in the HIV space.

Speaker:

Fast forward, uh, 10 years and, and now I work as the Chief

Speaker:

Science Officer for PEPFAR.

Speaker:

Really trying, trying to deliver on my own ambition to support

Speaker:

and improve health systems, um,

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

in those countries.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

I just wanted to open up to just a last question for you, Dr. Reid, anything

Speaker:

that you can recommend for folks who are interested in global health in the

Speaker:

future and folks who are interested in advocating for lenacapavir's

Speaker:

implementation broadly going forward.

Speaker:

Yeah, brilliant question.

Speaker:

I love that question.

Speaker:

So, let me zoom out and say I think global health is at an

Speaker:

inflection point right now.

Speaker:

We're at a point where there is a change of political priorities around

Speaker:

the importance of global health.

Speaker:

I think political attention is waning.

Speaker:

And some of that moral ambition that led to PEPFAR being established is waning

Speaker:

in places like the US and, and there is a really important responsibility

Speaker:

on people that care about these issues to, to make a loud effective noise in

Speaker:

support of initiatives like PEPFAR.

Speaker:

PEPFAR has had an incredible impact over the last 20 years.

Speaker:

Um, but to sustain that impact, I think does require an ongoing political

Speaker:

investment from our leadership.

Speaker:

And I, I think this is a, a really critical time for people interested in

Speaker:

global health to exercise their advocacy and protesting capabilities to ensure

Speaker:

that we continue to prioritize global health in settings like the US which

Speaker:

historically has been the funder of substantial global health programming

Speaker:

. And so I think there is a considerable value in, in folks like you Anshel

Speaker:

telling your congresspeople and, and senators about the importance of PEPFAR.

Speaker:

You know, as to the role of lenacapavir, again, there is no doubt that LEN is

Speaker:

incredibly efficacious clinically, but but unless we're able to show that it's

Speaker:

cost effective, then that that clinical efficacy won't be realized on the

Speaker:

ground in the places that need it most.

Speaker:

And in order for us to get to that point where it's cost effective, again, I

Speaker:

think there is, there is real need for advocacy and ambition to ensure that we

Speaker:

procure the volumes necessary in the first instance from Gilead to make it available.

Speaker:

Mm.

Speaker:

And that motivates the generics to, to, to invest.

Speaker:

So the price comes down to a point at which partner governments can afford it.

Speaker:

So for all of those reasons, I think there is a role for, for

Speaker:

folks like you, advocating for LEN.

Speaker:

I'll just say one last thing.

Speaker:

Some of these things I write about on my substack, you can find

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

about my opinions on this and many other things at reimagineglobalhealth.

Speaker:

substack.com.

Speaker:

Thanks so much to Anshel and Mike for joining us today.

Speaker:

You can find more info on our website, febrilepodcast.com, where

Speaker:

we house the Consult Notes, which are written supplements of the

Speaker:

episodes with links to references, our library of ID infographics,

Speaker:

and a link to our merch store.

Speaker:

Febrile is produced with support from the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Speaker:

Please reach out if you have any suggestions for future shows or

Speaker:

wanna be more involved with Febrile.

Speaker:

Thanks for listening.

Speaker:

Stay safe and I'll see you next time.

About the Podcast

Show artwork for Febrile
Febrile
A Cultured Podcast