UA-184069179-1 136: Single-Payer Healthcare Through an ID Lens - Febrile

Episode 136

136: Single-Payer Healthcare Through an ID Lens

Febrile is joined by Drs. Brian Bramson, James Lewis, Christian Hendrix, and Erica Kaufman West who discuss an all-too-common scenario and explore how single-payer health care systems may impact ID practice.

Learn more about the Single-Payer Interest Group at the bottom of this IDSA page! The Single-Payer Interest Group aims to bring members together to (1) learn about single-payer health care systems (and how it may impact the practice of Infectious Diseases); and (2) advocate for a national single-payer healthcare system in the United States. Join the Single-Payer Interest Group

You can also find Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP) here

Episodes | Consult Notes | Subscribe | Twitter | Merch | febrilepodcast@gmail.com

Febrile is produced with support from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)

Transcript
Speaker:

Sara Dong : Hi, everyone.

Speaker:

Welcome to Febrile, a cultured podcast about all things infectious disease.

Speaker:

We use consult questions to dive into ID clinical reasoning, diagnostics,

Speaker:

and antimicrobial management.

Speaker:

I'm Sara Dong, your host.

Speaker:

We have several guests joining us today to help talk a little bit about the idea

Speaker:

of single-payer healthcare in the US.

Speaker:

I'll first introduce Dr. Brian Bramson.

Speaker:

Brian is a Professor of Medicine at UNC Chapel Hill, where he works

Speaker:

as an ID clinician and educator of students, residents, and fellows.

Speaker:

Prior to joining the UNC faculty, he worked as clinical director of

Speaker:

community health centers in Central North Carolina, and has lived and

Speaker:

worked in Tanzania, Laos, and Malawi.

Speaker:

He is a member of the National Board of Directors for Physicians

Speaker:

for a National Health Program

Brian Bramson:

Hi, I'm Brian.

Brian Bramson:

I'm excited to be here

Brian Bramson:

Sara Dong : Dr. James Lewis is next.

Brian Bramson:

James is a public health physician trained in infectious diseases, preventative

Brian Bramson:

medicine, and internal medicine

Brian Bramson:

He trained in internal medicine at Washington University in St. Louis,

Brian Bramson:

followed by training in ID and preventative medicine at UNC Chapel Hill.

Brian Bramson:

He also completed his MPH in epidemiology at UNC Gillings

Brian Bramson:

School of Global Public Health.

Brian Bramson:

He has now worked in public health for the last ten years at local and state

Brian Bramson:

levels in North Carolina and Washington.

James Lewis:

Hi, I'm James.

James Lewis:

Thanks for having me

James Lewis:

Sara Dong : Next we have Dr. Christian Hendrix.

James Lewis:

Christian aspires to be a revolutionary and a clinician educator within

James Lewis:

ID and critical care medicine in order to fight health inequity.

James Lewis:

She has completed the medical education track and ID critical care track

James Lewis:

through her ID fellowship at WashU, and she now remains at WashU during her

James Lewis:

transition to critical care fellowship

Christian Hendrix:

Hey, everybody.

Christian Hendrix:

My name's Christian Hendrix.

Christian Hendrix:

It's great to see you all

Christian Hendrix:

Sara Dong : And last but not least, we have Dr. Erica Kaufman West.

Christian Hendrix:

Erica is an infectious disease physician focusing on wounds,

Christian Hendrix:

HIV, and viral hepatitis.

Christian Hendrix:

She completed her ID fellowship at the Cedars Sinai-UCLA combined program.

Christian Hendrix:

She currently is working clinically in Indiana and is the medical director

Christian Hendrix:

of the infectious disease section of a health system there in Indiana

Christian Hendrix:

Erica Kaufman West: Hi, I'm Erica.

Christian Hendrix:

Glad to be here

Sara Dong:

Before we get started, as everyone's favorite cultured

Sara Dong:

podcast, I always ask our guests to share a little piece of culture,

Sara Dong:

really just something non-medical, non-work-related that makes you happy.

Sara Dong:

Maybe I'll go backwards.

Sara Dong:

Christian, what about you?

Christian Hendrix:

Thanks, Sara.

Christian Hendrix:

So, um, my culture podcast tidbit today is probably gonna be when studying

Christian Hendrix:

for step one exams, my sister bought me a Groupon for exercise classes

Christian Hendrix:

that I used for cross-training.

Christian Hendrix:

So I've been addicted ever since.

Christian Hendrix:

I really enjoy prioritizing health and doing local competitions with my gym

Christian Hendrix:

family and fiancé at LAB Gym in St. Louis

James Lewis:

I can go.

James Lewis:

This is James and I actually interestingly was also really into

James Lewis:

cross-training and did that actively for seven years, and I started in St.

James Lewis:

Louis where Christian's now in training where I did, uh, did training as well.

James Lewis:

And then, uh, the big thing I do now is, um, I've gotten into Peloton since

James Lewis:

the pandemic and really like that.

James Lewis:

But my big hobby is I collect vinyl records and like doing a lot of

James Lewis:

things, messing around with those.

Brian Bramson:

Yeah, um, this is Brian.

Brian Bramson:

I used to have a lot more diverse hobbies and interests, but career

Brian Bramson:

and other obligations shrank them.

Brian Bramson:

My big one is I got interested in brazilian jujitsu way back in

Brian Bramson:

2012 and got completely addicted.

Brian Bramson:

Do that several times a week, and actually just got my black

Brian Bramson:

belt about three months ago

Sara Dong:

Wow.

Sara Dong:

Very nice.

Brian Bramson:

Thank you

Brian Bramson:

Erica Kaufman West: For me, I, um, we are maybe the m- the most

Brian Bramson:

active, uh, ID group here because we're-- mine is also an activity.

Brian Bramson:

So I started doing online yoga during the pandemic and really loved it, so I became

Brian Bramson:

a certified yoga instructor, and I am now pursuing my 300-hour training certificate,

Brian Bramson:

which hopefully I'll get, uh, by the end of this year or maybe early next year

Sara Dong:

Very nice.

Sara Dong:

Well, that's good, you guys.

Sara Dong:

It'll just inspire people to be active after they listen.

Sara Dong:

All right.

Sara Dong:

Okay, so today our case is a 51-year-old female.

Sara Dong:

She has type 2 diabetes, and she has lost her employer-provided insurance.

Sara Dong:

This happened when she left her full-time job to move in with and

Sara Dong:

to care for her ailing parents.

Sara Dong:

She continues to work some weekend shifts in a warehouse without benefits,

Sara Dong:

and these earnings are high enough to disqualify her for Medicaid eligibility.

Sara Dong:

After losing her health insurance, she stopped seeing her primary care

Sara Dong:

physician or taking her medications.

Sara Dong:

Subsequently, she develops an ulcer near the base of her right

Sara Dong:

great toe that becomes swollen and is draining purulent fluid.

Sara Dong:

She presents to the local emergency department, where X-rays show

Sara Dong:

no evidence of osteomyelitis.

Sara Dong:

She's given a seven-day course of amoxicillin-clavulanate, which

Sara Dong:

she can afford through Walmart.

Sara Dong:

Following this treatment, she gets a little bit better, has some transient

Sara Dong:

improvement, but unfortunately, the erythema and purulence has

Sara Dong:

returned and is worsening, so she goes back to the emergency room.

Sara Dong:

The hospital social worker helps her get, at this time, still subsidized,

Sara Dong:

ACA coverage with a high deductible plan After this, she is seen in podiatry clinic

Sara Dong:

where her persistent wound is debrided.

Sara Dong:

At this visit, there is a clinical concern for underlying osteomyelitis.

Sara Dong:

So cultures from the wound debridement show mixed gram-positive

Sara Dong:

and gram-negative bacteria with a negative molecular screen for MRSA.

Sara Dong:

The patient is placed on amoxicillin-clavulanate as well

Sara Dong:

as ciprofloxacin, which again are available at Walmart at low prices.

Sara Dong:

And so she has that for a ten-day course and is referred over to

Sara Dong:

the infectious disease clinic.

Sara Dong:

Fortunately, the patient does get scheduled quickly.

Sara Dong:

She's able to afford the copay for the visit, and the ID physician examines

Sara Dong:

the wound, is also quite worried about osteomyelitis, so they order

Sara Dong:

an MRI, and the insurer requires a time-consuming prior authorization.

Sara Dong:

But eventually, that MRI is approved, and the patient's insurance

Sara Dong:

has a high annual deductible.

Sara Dong:

This has not been met, and the out-of-pocket costs are prohibitive.

Sara Dong:

So after of this information and these delays, the less preferred CT

Sara Dong:

scan of the foot is ordered instead.

Sara Dong:

The CT report comes back suggesting underlying osteomyelitis of the first

Sara Dong:

and second metatarsals, and she is ultimately taken to the OR with podiatry

Sara Dong:

for a transmetatarsal amputation.

Sara Dong:

Surgical bone margins show osteomyelitis on pathology, and the clean proximal bone

Sara Dong:

culture shows fluoroquinolone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Sara Dong:

Her treatment plan determined by the ID team is for three weeks of

Sara Dong:

piperacillin-tazobactam IV under the clinic's OPAT supervision.

Sara Dong:

She is able to complete this antibiotic course, but during her

Sara Dong:

course of care, the hospital system and insurer had reached an impasse.

Sara Dong:

The facility where she is seen was labeled as out of network.

Sara Dong:

So during these negotiations, the ninety-day No Surprises Act extension

Sara Dong:

expires, and the patient cannot afford the cost of uncovered follow-up

Sara Dong:

appointments with either ID or podiatry.

Sara Dong:

Eventually the contract dispute is settled.

Sara Dong:

By the time she arrives at the podiatry and ID clinics for a delayed

Sara Dong:

follow-up, her surgical site shows wound dehiscence and purulence has returned.

Sara Dong:

ID orders an MRI, her deductible was now met, which showed osteomyelitis

Sara Dong:

more proximal to the original margins, and the patient requires

Sara Dong:

a below-the-knee amputation.

Sara Dong:

She is worried about her future employment prospects and her

Sara Dong:

ability to take care of her parents.

Sara Dong:

So not a totally unfamiliar story and a patient facing so many structural

Sara Dong:

financial barriers and system failure points here just to get help for what I

Sara Dong:

think all of us would agree should be a kinda common run-of-the-mill infection.

Sara Dong:

So what are your thoughts about this?

Sara Dong:

You know, approaching care for patients with barriers due to insurance status.

Sara Dong:

Christian, maybe I'll start with you

Christian Hendrix:

Sure.

Christian Hendrix:

Thanks, Sara.

Christian Hendrix:

So in this patient, we see a system that's clearly failed her.

Christian Hendrix:

To summarize, our patient faced barriers to diagnosis, primary

Christian Hendrix:

care, diagnostics, and treatment.

Christian Hendrix:

I wish this represented a unique scenario, but I think many physicians

Christian Hendrix:

agree, and ID physicians agree, that we are faced with this daily.

Christian Hendrix:

And regarding the approach to our patients, first let's talk about the delay

Christian Hendrix:

in access to care It's disappointing.

Christian Hendrix:

Something as simple as ensuring that everyone either meets CDC guidelines for

Christian Hendrix:

HIV and Hep C lifetime screening, um, can be daunting when you're implementing

Christian Hendrix:

an individualized approach to connect patients to care and retain them in

Christian Hendrix:

care, let alone incorporating principles of health equity to more nuanced

Christian Hendrix:

patients like we have in this case.

Christian Hendrix:

And while a lot of work has been done to address barriers to care, we

Christian Hendrix:

still see delay in access to care.

Christian Hendrix:

Institutions and government agencies have studied this, especially in

Christian Hendrix:

patients with poor health outcomes, and we know what the issue is.

Christian Hendrix:

For instance, the Healthy People 2020 National Report lists access to care

Christian Hendrix:

as an initiative because we know that without access to care, our patients

Christian Hendrix:

with infections, whether it's sexually transmitted infections, HIV, or diabetic

Christian Hendrix:

foot infections, have worse outcomes.

Christian Hendrix:

This was reported also in the Institute of Medicine Care Without Coverage report.

Christian Hendrix:

In the ICU setting with infections as the etiology for septic shock, we can

Christian Hendrix:

see patients die at higher rates due to insurance impact on their access to care.

Christian Hendrix:

And since 1902 the mortality among Negroes in the city of the South,

Christian Hendrix:

we've researched why some patients literally die, we know we need better

Christian Hendrix:

healthcare access for our patients.

Christian Hendrix:

And we also know the impact of medical mistrust and social vulnerability,

Christian Hendrix:

but it's not a new finding that patients need access to healthcare.

Christian Hendrix:

I just want to speak a little bit as a fellow physician 'cause I'm often

Christian Hendrix:

thankful for colleagues who are truly going above and beyond with exemplary

Christian Hendrix:

efforts and innovation to navigate these types of scenarios for our patients.

Christian Hendrix:

But unfortunately, our system proves over and over again that it's still

Christian Hendrix:

not enough, and we ultimately fail our patients just like this one.

Christian Hendrix:

And being a part of the system every day leads to moral injury, and we'll talk

Christian Hendrix:

about that a little bit later, but in addition to this first point, as far as

Christian Hendrix:

our approach to patients, first we have access to care that's harming patients.

Christian Hendrix:

And we note that not only is the way we currently finance healthcare harmful in

Christian Hendrix:

this way in creating barriers to access, but when patients are finally engaged

Christian Hendrix:

with care, we face barriers in treatment options, even through medication choices.

Christian Hendrix:

So for instance, the type of medication that I might want for my patient is

Christian Hendrix:

going to be different due to cost, and if the insurance company approves my

Christian Hendrix:

request, that should not be normalized, as other countries such as Cuba or Canada

Christian Hendrix:

have implemented systems that prove that healthcare access can be universal

Christian Hendrix:

and doesn't have to be corporatized.

Christian Hendrix:

And even within our country, the Black Panthers in the US implemented

Christian Hendrix:

accessible healthcare, so we know that it's possible, and we don't have

Christian Hendrix:

to accept that the healthcare system will remain the way it is today.

Christian Hendrix:

I mean, sitting on the phone for hours pleading for what is ethical truly

Christian Hendrix:

creates within me a visceral reaction.

Christian Hendrix:

Like, I'm pleading for medications that are the best option for my patients.

Christian Hendrix:

And I have patients whose insurance company tells HIV medication they're

Christian Hendrix:

going to allow, which antifungal treatment they're going to pay for, no

Christian Hendrix:

matter if it's more expensive or not.

Christian Hendrix:

Or I had an insurance company tell me that they will only accept

Christian Hendrix:

an IV medication for treatment when oral options were available.

Christian Hendrix:

I mean, fighting prior auths right now has become very ridiculous.

Christian Hendrix:

I know I've decided I'm not going to accept healthcare

Christian Hendrix:

the way it is today in the US.

Christian Hendrix:

I'm gonna fight against it, join anyone in solidarity who's also fighting against it.

Christian Hendrix:

Many times we can't confirm documentation that an infectious diseases physician

Christian Hendrix:

has even reviewed these cases, and when we work in multidisciplinary teams

Christian Hendrix:

with an attending, myself, pharmacy, nurses, and the patient for a medication

Christian Hendrix:

approval that's repeatedly denied over months, I'm not gonna accept it.

Christian Hendrix:

I'm gonna work with others who also won't accept that.

Christian Hendrix:

And to clarify, losing hours on the phone and communication would not be as

Christian Hendrix:

disheartening if I knew that the system wouldn't remain the way that it is today.

Christian Hendrix:

But I do ultimately believe that we'll win in providing equitable care for patients

Christian Hendrix:

because, like I said, we know what the issue is with our current healthcare

Christian Hendrix:

system that benefits profit over patients.

Christian Hendrix:

So, in this patient and in others, we have a system that, for the first point,

Christian Hendrix:

is delaying access to care, but also we want to highlight barriers to medications.

Christian Hendrix:

On top of this, we're battling prior auths, so we can confirm a diagnosis

Christian Hendrix:

when coordinating, for instance, imaging.

Christian Hendrix:

And yet, over decades, we have evidence that shows not having

Christian Hendrix:

access to care is associated with these worse healthcare outcomes.

Christian Hendrix:

In addition to mortality outcomes, we know that specifically in our patient

Christian Hendrix:

and related patient populations, we have even more comorbidities to consider

Christian Hendrix:

that affects her, like amputation rates.

Christian Hendrix:

Research studies by vascular surgeons and cardiologists show, and I quote,

Christian Hendrix:

"Poorer patients and those living in poorer regions of the country have less

Christian Hendrix:

access to quality healthcare and have the highest amputation rates." And this

Christian Hendrix:

is in reference to diabetic-associated infections, specifically in patients

Christian Hendrix:

with peripheral vascular disease.

Christian Hendrix:

And James, I know that working in public health, I assume you might have similar

Christian Hendrix:

evidence to share or similar experiences?

James Lewis:

Yeah.

James Lewis:

Thanks, Christian.

James Lewis:

I just wanna say a really inspiring response.

James Lewis:

Looking forward to seeing you get out of training and get out

James Lewis:

there and, uh, and take this on.

James Lewis:

So thanks for, thanks for your position.

James Lewis:

Uh, you mentioned a couple publications on this topic, and I thought I would just, at

James Lewis:

the risk of being a little boring, would throw in a couple more statistics that

James Lewis:

kind of further illustrate the problem.

James Lewis:

In the paper, the relationship of health insurance and mortality,

James Lewis:

is lack of insurance deadly?

James Lewis:

Pro-probably don't even need to say the statistic.

James Lewis:

That's a pretty leading, uh, leading title.

James Lewis:

Um, uh, but in there, Woolhandler and Himmelstein, uh, all the way back in

James Lewis:

twenty seventeen, and really we're updating a conclusion from back in

James Lewis:

2002 from the Institute of Medicine, showed that the odds of dying among

James Lewis:

insured relative to uninsured ranged from 0.71 to zero point nine seven,

James Lewis:

uh, which you can, you know, take to mean essentially uninsurance is

James Lewis:

associated with excess mortality.

James Lewis:

Then, uh, in a more recent paper from 2022 called Health Insurance Status and

James Lewis:

Cancer Stage at Diagnosis and Survival in the US, again, a pretty leading

James Lewis:

title, Zhao and, uh, and colleagues showed uninsured and Medicaid-insured

James Lewis:

patients were significantly more likely to present with higher stage cancer,

James Lewis:

so stage three and four, and had worse stage-specific survival for twelve

James Lewis:

of the seventeen stageable cancers.

James Lewis:

And then it's been, uh, shown in multiple additional papers as well.

James Lewis:

You know, you can dig into it, uh, pretty easily.

James Lewis:

And Christian mentioned it, this isn't just diabetic ulcers, HIV patients,

James Lewis:

or even hep C screening, and all of the other, uh, instances where,

James Lewis:

you know, that Christian mentioned.

James Lewis:

It's cancer, it's diabetes, it's, really kind of every aspect of healthcare.

James Lewis:

And specifically in my experience working in public health for the last ten years,

James Lewis:

most of my clinical work recently has been providing care to those who have TB. It's

James Lewis:

really incredible some of the diagnoses we see that are, it, it just so delayed.

James Lewis:

So for instance, I had a patient recently with Potts disease who had been presenting

James Lewis:

with back pain multiple times to the ER over the course of about eighteen months.

James Lewis:

Had imaging with the history of this person being from, uh, Western

James Lewis:

Africa, pretty clearly was Potts disease, but there wasn't, you know,

James Lewis:

these so-called emergent or alarm symptoms that would, uh, kind of

James Lewis:

make the an inpatient intervention, uh, happened, and so they kept being

James Lewis:

discharged from the ER and referred for outpatient workup with neurosurgery.

James Lewis:

Well, as you can imagine, this person does not have insurance, and so eventually

James Lewis:

it got to the point where there were, you know, alarm symptoms, and they ended

James Lewis:

up getting admitted to the hospital and having to have a pretty intense

James Lewis:

spinal surgery to, to stabilize the spine and, and wash out the infection.

James Lewis:

Uh, and their disease course was obviously and comorbidities were much worse than

James Lewis:

would have, uh, been if that had been addressed, you know, the first or even

James Lewis:

the second time that, that they had showed up in the ER with a diagnosis

James Lewis:

that was clear really from the beginning.

James Lewis:

And then we've had about two patients just in the last year and a half

James Lewis:

present with very advanced TB to the ER, resulting in death and even in

James Lewis:

one instance, a transmission to a healthcare worker, uh, uh, during the

James Lewis:

care trying to save that patient's life.

James Lewis:

So, this is a real problem, and it, it definitely is impacting a lot of patients,

James Lewis:

and it really has the highest impact on our most marginalized populations

James Lewis:

Erica Kaufman West: Uh, if I can jump in, along those same lines, when we

James Lewis:

talk about marginalized patients, I always think, I have an HIV clinic

James Lewis:

and I think of those patients.

James Lewis:

And initially I thought, "Oh, these folks are, um, they're sort of sheltered

James Lewis:

because we, we actually do have a fairly, you know, good, HIV safety net," right?

James Lewis:

You have Ryan White, you have, um, ADAP for medication.

James Lewis:

So we do a pretty good job of making sure that anybody with HIV has

James Lewis:

HIV-related medical care coverage.

James Lewis:

But that's only for HIV care.

James Lewis:

So, I had a patient recently with HIV that had an abscessed tooth, and so it

James Lewis:

was not, not like routine dental work.

James Lewis:

We needed an oral surgeon to be able to go in there.

James Lewis:

Couldn't find one.

James Lewis:

The patient's now looking at a hospitalization.

James Lewis:

They don't actually have regular medical insurance, so they don't wanna go

James Lewis:

because now they're worried that, you know, this is gonna become a huge bill.

James Lewis:

Ends up with osteomyelitis of the mandible and once again, not an uncommon

James Lewis:

scenario to all of us when you have these delays in care because people

James Lewis:

are worried about accessing care, like James said, coming in with more

James Lewis:

advanced TB disease than was necessary.

James Lewis:

We start to get these more advanced diseases and thus worse outcomes.

Brian Bramson:

I could just jump in.

Brian Bramson:

You know, I think it's really great to discuss this through a clinical

Brian Bramson:

podcast because Sara, I think as you mentioned at the outset, this is

Brian Bramson:

not a strange scenario I'm sure for anyone listening to this podcast.

Brian Bramson:

And if I have a concern for us, it's that we, we swim in this sea so much,

Brian Bramson:

the water we're not even aware of.

Brian Bramson:

But this is not really a normal system, and I really appreciate my colleagues

Brian Bramson:

here illustrating a lot of the ways how the system harms those without insurance.

Brian Bramson:

I think another thing I just wanna highlight is it doesn't work that well

Brian Bramson:

for people who have insurance, and this vi- vignette we just discussed

Brian Bramson:

really illustrates some of those things that are integrated even into the

Brian Bramson:

system with people who have insurance.

Brian Bramson:

Things like high copays, high deductibles, narrow networks or shifting networks.

Brian Bramson:

There was actually a commonwealth study done back in 2016 that found that a

Brian Bramson:

third of Americans in the last year have had to either delay or forgo prescribed

Brian Bramson:

healthcare because of costs involved.

Brian Bramson:

And for comparator, like they looked at how often does that happen

Brian Bramson:

in places like Germany or Great Britain, and the number was about 7%.

Brian Bramson:

So, you know, it just doesn't seem to work very well for the

Brian Bramson:

patients with, with insurance.

Brian Bramson:

There's even statistics out there that the wealthiest 1% of white infants

Brian Bramson:

in America have an infant mortality rate greater than that in most of the

Brian Bramson:

Scandinavian countries, for instance.

Brian Bramson:

So even our most privileged don't get to enjoy the good healthcare outcomes.

Brian Bramson:

So I don't think the system is working well for patients

Brian Bramson:

really across the spectrum.

Brian Bramson:

also, and I think we can all resonate with this, it doesn't work

Brian Bramson:

well for us either professionally.

Brian Bramson:

We spend a lot of our time trying to clear completely artificial bureaucratic

Brian Bramson:

hurdles that have been put in place, um, trying to get prior authorizations.

Brian Bramson:

I think everyone listening to this, I'm sure, has done a peer-to-peer telephone

Brian Bramson:

interview that was essentially pointless.

Brian Bramson:

You know, we, um, also spend an excessive amount of time in our documentation

Brian Bramson:

compared to other peers in developed countries, and a lot of that is

Brian Bramson:

because our documentation is not really driven by clinical communication.

Brian Bramson:

It's driven by charge

Brian Bramson:

capture and every clinic visit, every consult has to meet multiple

Brian Bramson:

different criteria that are often different compared to who the payer

Brian Bramson:

is in order to, to get reimbursement.

Brian Bramson:

I came across just a mind-blowing uh, comparison a while back.

Brian Bramson:

So Duke University Hospital, which is just up the road from where

Brian Bramson:

I practice in Chapel Hill, um, sometimes it hurts me to admit it,

Brian Bramson:

but they're a fantastic hospital.

Brian Bramson:

Uh, 957 beds the last time I, I, I looked, and that number was from

Brian Bramson:

2018, so it, it might have grown.

Brian Bramson:

But for a 957-bed hospital in 2018, Duke was employing 1,600

Brian Bramson:

people in their billing department.

Brian Bramson:

Now,

Christian Hendrix:

No, no

Brian Bramson:

seems already like a lot.

Brian Bramson:

If you look at the hospital at, um, the University of Toronto Hospital,

Brian Bramson:

which is about a 1,270-bed hospital, around the same time in 2019, that

Brian Bramson:

hospital system employed seven people in their billing department.

Brian Bramson:

And a lot of that because they have a very simplified single-payer billing system,

Brian Bramson:

and you can easily just extrapolate all those overhead costs to really every

Brian Bramson:

group practice, every private practice in every specialty in the United States.

Brian Bramson:

Every hospital spends a lot of time on administrative overhead.

Brian Bramson:

So not working r- really for patients.

Brian Bramson:

It's not working for us.

Brian Bramson:

It's just not working

Brian Bramson:

Erica Kaufman West: Yeah, and I, I would like to expound a little bit on

Brian Bramson:

the effect of, on us, uh, physicians.

Brian Bramson:

It's, it's obviously everyone in healthcare, doctors,

Brian Bramson:

nurses, you know, NPs/PAs.

Brian Bramson:

But for us specifically as physicians, as we said, I think multiple times, the case

Brian Bramson:

that we presented is not unique, right?

Brian Bramson:

We all can think of a case where we had to change what we wanted to do, what

Brian Bramson:

was best practice, and, and a lot of times what was actually evidence-based,

Brian Bramson:

and change it to fit what the insurer would do or what they would cover.

Brian Bramson:

And so we are all… If you, if you think of it, it's not just that

Brian Bramson:

we're like, "Oh, I'm just gonna pick this other antibiotic." You

Brian Bramson:

are being asked to make compromises in the care that you're providing.

Brian Bramson:

So, like, if you sit with that for a second, you're being asked

Brian Bramson:

to compromise the care for this patient, and we are so used to this.

Brian Bramson:

From the time we're in medical school, we think that this is just the way

Brian Bramson:

medicine works, it is here, but it's not the way that it has to be 'cause it's

Brian Bramson:

not the way it is in other countries.

Brian Bramson:

It brings to mind that idea of death by a thousand paper cuts, and I, I think that's

Brian Bramson:

what is happening to us as physicians.

Brian Bramson:

So, this is moral injury and moral distress through a thousand decisions

Brian Bramson:

to instead do plan B or plan C or plan D instead of plan A. So, it's choosing

Brian Bramson:

the slightly lesser antibiotic because of cost, or it's having someone go home

Brian Bramson:

with OPAT instead of the skilled nursing facility (SNF) when you know they're gonna

Brian Bramson:

struggle with ADLs, and you know they're not gonna give that antibiotic every six

Brian Bramson:

hours at home because who can do that?

Brian Bramson:

And if you stop to think about it, we do this all the time.

Brian Bramson:

All of those paper cuts, all of those conscious decisions to provide

Brian Bramson:

lesser care, it's driving us out of medicine, it's blanketing us

Brian Bramson:

in depression and suicidality, and it's decreasing our quality of life.

Brian Bramson:

There have been a lot of surveys over the years that show that people in healthcare

Brian Bramson:

suffer from moral injury at higher rates than other jobs in the US, and often

Brian Bramson:

this gets labeled as burnout, right?

Brian Bramson:

Doctors are burning out.

Brian Bramson:

Nurses are burning out.

Brian Bramson:

That's why we're all leaving medicine.

Brian Bramson:

But I actually don't think it's burnout.

Brian Bramson:

So, we all know how to work long hours.

Brian Bramson:

We all know that we're missing birthday parties and cousins'

Brian Bramson:

weddings and holiday events.

Brian Bramson:

We signed up for a profession that requires sacrifice and precision, and

Brian Bramson:

we knew this, and we have done it.

Brian Bramson:

That's not the problem.

Brian Bramson:

What we didn't sign up for was that feeling of beating your head against the

Brian Bramson:

wall, making dozens of phone calls to try and get an HIV med approved or doing

Brian Bramson:

that pointless peer-to-peer, like Brian said, only to realize that's not the end.

Brian Bramson:

This is going to continue for the next patient and the next day because

Brian Bramson:

that's the way the system is built.

Brian Bramson:

It's designed to maximize profits, and it doesn't care that it's

Brian Bramson:

chipping away at our morality.

Brian Bramson:

And physicians suffer from this, and patients suffer,

Brian Bramson:

but we suffer as physicians

James Lewis:

Yeah.

James Lewis:

Uh, Erica, I totally agree with you and Brian.

James Lewis:

I wanted to jump in and explore that concept of the physicians and patients

James Lewis:

suffering, uh, from a specific angle.

James Lewis:

So I mentioned I work a lot with TB patients and I'm in public health, and I

James Lewis:

have the luxury of pretty much scheduling as much time as I want with patients.

James Lewis:

We don't do any billing.

James Lewis:

We may start doing some billing at some point, since, you know, public

James Lewis:

health is hurting, uh, as you can imagine at this point in time.

James Lewis:

Uh, but regardless, it will not be the focus by any means.

James Lewis:

And, and right now we don't bill at all.

James Lewis:

And so I routinely spend an hour and sometimes more with, with a TB patient,

James Lewis:

and it really brought to light this concept, uh, that this whole setup really

James Lewis:

creates an adversarial relationship between us and the patients who actually

James Lewis:

need us and need our time the most.

James Lewis:

And most of that interaction is not gonna be reimbursable or meet our

James Lewis:

RVUs past a certain point, certainly.

James Lewis:

And that puts us, personally, potentially in a, in a adversarial situation with

James Lewis:

regard to bonuses or reimbursement, and then also potentially puts

James Lewis:

us in a negative light or footing with the organization we work for.

James Lewis:

Uh, and then that is definitely gonna lead to the concept you were talking

James Lewis:

about, Erica, with this moral injury.

James Lewis:

Like, that doesn't feel good, you know?

James Lewis:

Even if you don't totally realize what's happening.

James Lewis:

I know I didn't really put that together until I started spending a

James Lewis:

lot of time with individual patients, more than I could have, during

James Lewis:

training and previous clinical jobs.

James Lewis:

And, it definitely feels much better for me.

James Lewis:

I walk out of that room feeling like I did a good job and like I

James Lewis:

answered all the questions they had and, uh, there wasn't anything else

James Lewis:

they needed from me in that moment.

James Lewis:

And then I, I can't speak for them, but it certainly seems hugely appreciated by

James Lewis:

the patients as well, and often they get a lot of questions answered that they

James Lewis:

have been trying to get answered before.

James Lewis:

And, and, you know, with this patient population, obviously, uh, English is

James Lewis:

often a second language, if spoken at all.

James Lewis:

And so, uh, we work closely with interpreters, which, I know from

James Lewis:

personal experience, when you're in a rush, in a hurry, it's really hard

James Lewis:

to have an effective interaction with

James Lewis:

Erica Kaufman West: Mm-hmm.

James Lewis:

using an interpreter.Um, you really have to, you know, be intentional

James Lewis:

and set some time aside for it.

James Lewis:

so so I definitely agree with you both, and I just wanted to highlight that

James Lewis:

one specific way that it's hurting us.

Brian Bramson:

Thanks, James.

Brian Bramson:

I just, if I could, I just wanna jump back in 'cause I really think

Brian Bramson:

that you hit something on the head there when you talked about the

Brian Bramson:

different kind of practice enabled really by a different payment model.

Brian Bramson:

I'm certainly of the opinion that while there is no perfect system, and there is

Brian Bramson:

nothing I could describe that would take care of every problem that we have, I do

Brian Bramson:

think lot of places have better systems, and I do think there are some pretty

Brian Bramson:

exciting proposals being discussed now to really improve that payment model.

Brian Bramson:

And one that I'm very much in favor of that maybe people haven't

Brian Bramson:

heard the specifics of too much is what goes under the somewhat

Brian Bramson:

problematic term of Medicare for All.

Brian Bramson:

And I think really a better way to think about it is improved Medicare for All.

Brian Bramson:

The best, most fleshed out bill, for this, proposal for this is the one

Brian Bramson:

that's before, Congress right now.

Brian Bramson:

And just to acquaint people with what, with what's included in that,

Brian Bramson:

it's, it's basically a bill to, to provide comprehensive coverage.

Brian Bramson:

And when I say comprehensive, I mean inpatient, outpatient, primary

Brian Bramson:

care, specialty care, pharmacy, vision, hearing, long-term care.

Brian Bramson:

All bills for all those services would go directly to the government.

Brian Bramson:

It wouldn't really technically be what often goes by the name of socialized

Brian Bramson:

medicine because doctors, clinicians, hospitals would still be private.

Brian Bramson:

It would just be the bills would all go to, to Medicare.

Brian Bramson:

This would be funded really through, taxes.

Brian Bramson:

It would be taxpayer-funded.

Brian Bramson:

The proposal that's before Congress calls for no premiums,

Brian Bramson:

co-pays, d- deductibles whatsoever.

Brian Bramson:

It's paid on the back end by our taxes.

Brian Bramson:

It's free at the point of care.

Brian Bramson:

So the minute you start talking about taxes, people quite

Brian Bramson:

understandably, all of us, get a little anxious about what that means.

Brian Bramson:

Well, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office looked at the bill, and they scored

Brian Bramson:

it, and they came to the conclusion that in about 95% American households, the

Brian Bramson:

amount they would have to pay in increased taxes would be smaller than what those

Brian Bramson:

households are currently spending on healthcare because of premiums, co-pays,

Brian Bramson:

deductibles, et cetera, and in a lot of cases, it would be substantially less.

Brian Bramson:

There was a study done by Yale pretty recently of this, uh, the Medicare

Brian Bramson:

for All proposal that's gotten a lot of attention, where they were

Brian Bramson:

estimating it would save about 100,000 lives per year and about $1 trillion.

Brian Bramson:

So yeah.

Brian Bramson:

One other thing I just wanna kind of address clearly, I know whether my

Brian Bramson:

physician colleagues will admit it or not, any time they start hearing things

Brian Bramson:

like single payer health insurance Everyone's a little bit worried, "Well,

Brian Bramson:

what's, what does that mean for me?

Brian Bramson:

I'm still paying off my med school loans, et cetera.

Brian Bramson:

I've got kids to put through college." Believe me, I get that.

Brian Bramson:

I don't really think there's anything here that ought to

Brian Bramson:

scare us on that, on that front.

Brian Bramson:

That same Congressional Budget Office analysis, uh, again, said th-

Brian Bramson:

they were predicting that overall payments to physicians were gonna

Brian Bramson:

increase under Medicare for All.

Brian Bramson:

There's been a couple of really good published studies where they looked at

Brian Bramson:

models of single payer that had been introduced in different individual states.

Brian Bramson:

So they had fleshed out the specifics of how single payer would work in

Brian Bramson:

that state, and then they modeled how that would play out for hypothetical

Brian Bramson:

practices under each of those models.

Brian Bramson:

In every one, physician's net income actually increased.

Brian Bramson:

Some of this is because you're not spending otherwise productive time

Brian Bramson:

doing things that nobody likes, like being on the phone with a peer-to-peer

Brian Bramson:

or filling out prior authorizations.

Brian Bramson:

There's also the decreased overhead costs associated with billing with

Brian Bramson:

a more simplified billing model.

Brian Bramson:

And then most of these models haven't even included all these other knock-on effects.

Brian Bramson:

For instance, right now the number one line item in malpractice

Brian Bramson:

judgments and settlements is the cost of future healthcare.

Brian Bramson:

Well, if you have a Medicare for All system, the cost of anyone's

Brian Bramson:

future healthcare is zero.

Brian Bramson:

So that is gonna automatically make judgments and settlements smaller,

Brian Bramson:

which certainly should make our malpractice premiums smaller.

Brian Bramson:

So I really don't think this ought to represent a threat to our profession

Brian Bramson:

economically, although I do feel like that's almost an instinctive way

Brian Bramson:

physicians have responded to it, which I think just needs some more education

Brian Bramson:

So yeah, if any of the people listening to this podcast wanna find out some

Brian Bramson:

more about this or get involved in how to advocate for this kind of change,

Brian Bramson:

all of us here in this group are part of, um, an interest group within the

Brian Bramson:

Infectious Disease Society of America.

Brian Bramson:

You can find us on the IDSA website.

Brian Bramson:

We're the single payer interest group.

Brian Bramson:

I'm also a member of an organization called Physicians for a National Health

Brian Bramson:

Program, which is the largest physicians advocacy group dedicated really

Brian Bramson:

exclusively to achieving single-payer healthcare, and we have about 35, 40,000

Brian Bramson:

of us now and growing all the time.

Brian Bramson:

You, you're all welcome to join us

Christian Hendrix:

Thanks, Brian.

Christian Hendrix:

Yeah, I'm definitely proud to be a part of, these organizations because

Christian Hendrix:

it gives me revolutionary hope.

Christian Hendrix:

And I would say I'm really appreciative for everything you all have shared today.

Christian Hendrix:

We have so much information, and having a place to go to gives us something

Christian Hendrix:

that we can do with this information so we can work with an organized

Christian Hendrix:

strategy to commit to daily actions.

Christian Hendrix:

You know, this is a system that's been in place.

Christian Hendrix:

It's not gonna change overnight.

Christian Hendrix:

We have to have some type of organized communication and commitment so that we

Christian Hendrix:

can continue our work that we do already.

Christian Hendrix:

we are all working hard already.

Christian Hendrix:

Um, but we do need a realistic, feasible plan that you outlined,

Christian Hendrix:

Brian, um, so that we can advocate and fight for healthcare for everyone.

Christian Hendrix:

I would say I'm over $400,000 in debt, but if you tell me that there's

Christian Hendrix:

a system that we can use and I will enjoy working with patients more,

Christian Hendrix:

I will feel more productive as a physician, I'm all for it.

Christian Hendrix:

Because that's the original reason most of us went into the healthcare field and want

Christian Hendrix:

to be a physician and talk to patients.

Christian Hendrix:

Um, so that's why I wanna fight for a better healthcare system.

Christian Hendrix:

And definitely would love to see some pe- in the IDSA single-payer interest group.

Christian Hendrix:

If you aren't connected to someone there or don't happen to be a

Christian Hendrix:

physician, just look out for other things that are going on as well.

Christian Hendrix:

You can look to a hospital where you might practice.

Christian Hendrix:

Your hospital might have an advocacy group.

Christian Hendrix:

You can connect with the community, see what their needs are, uplift

Christian Hendrix:

their voices so that we can all get healthcare access for the community.

Christian Hendrix:

A lot of times I talk to people about the actions that they're doing because

Christian Hendrix:

they might be complaining, as I am, about the system that's not working.

Christian Hendrix:

Sometimes people donate.

Christian Hendrix:

That can be helpful, but I think at this point, we are really seeing that

Christian Hendrix:

the system's going to need change.

Christian Hendrix:

And so if our goal is to impact the system, we have to really work together

Christian Hendrix:

to do a little bit more daily actions to fight for patients, especially those

Christian Hendrix:

who right now are being negatively impacted by health, specifically like

Christian Hendrix:

our trans populations, LGBTQ populations, minorities, immigrants, women's health.

Christian Hendrix:

Um, we want health equity, so we want everyone to have good health outcomes

Christian Hendrix:

and no groups to be left out of that.

Christian Hendrix:

So even though change might not come quickly or easily, it's our duty.

Christian Hendrix:

When we're dedicated together, we're very powerful.

Christian Hendrix:

I've been really empowered Brian, Erica, and James and learning from

Christian Hendrix:

them, so encourage others as well

Brian Bramson:

I just wanted to add one other comment.

Brian Bramson:

I love this podcast, and I love hearing people talk about how

Brian Bramson:

best to care for their patients.

Brian Bramson:

I have become a better clinician from this.

Brian Bramson:

If this clinical story, this vignette that we shared sounds familiar to people,

Brian Bramson:

I think this is one of those times where the practice change that we need to

Brian Bramson:

implement to better care for patients like this one is not a clinical change.

Brian Bramson:

It's not something we can prescribe or a test we can order.

Brian Bramson:

It's really a system that we have to change, and that's gonna take

Brian Bramson:

some advocacy and some involvement.

Brian Bramson:

So that would be the treatment plan, I think, for the patient

Brian Bramson:

discussed in this vignette

Brian Bramson:

Sara Dong : Thank you so much to our guests today, Christian,

Brian Bramson:

Erica, James, and Brian.

Brian Bramson:

Don't forget to check out the website febrilepodcast.com, where

Brian Bramson:

you can find our consult notes, our library of ID infographics,

Brian Bramson:

and a link to our merch store.

Brian Bramson:

Febrile is produced with support from the IDSA.

Brian Bramson:

Please reach out if you have any suggestions for future shows or want

Brian Bramson:

to be more involved with Febrile.

Brian Bramson:

Thanks for listening.

Brian Bramson:

Stay safe, and I'll see you next time

About the Podcast

Show artwork for Febrile
Febrile
A Cultured Podcast